"Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all
individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State."
and
"For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power
in the Reich. Unlimited authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its
organizations in general."
these both resemble the same thing... they both want to have a strong central government and a nationalistic society...
"We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so
long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic
race."
and
"but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the
individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains
what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the
State alone."
these two show that both governments are willing to let thier people have as much freedom as they can as long as their freedom stays within the bounries that dont impeed on the greater good of society.
"Peoples which are rising, or rising again after a period of decadence, are always imperialist; and
renunciation is a sign of decay and of death."
and
"We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, Schieber and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race."
these two show that thoes who defy the nation and its ideas shall be put to death for any treasonous affairs with out trial.
"the materialist conception of history of human civilization can be explained simply through the conflict of interests among the various social groups and by the change and development in the means and instruments of production."
and
"We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for alivelihood and way of life for the citizens. If it is impossible to sustain the total population of the State, then the members of foreign nations (non-citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich."
These both show that neither country want to have conflicts within thier society so thier solution is to discriminate.
"All citizens must have equal rights and obligations.'
and
"follows that the existence of an unchangeable and unchanging class-war is also denied - the natural progeny of the economic conception of history. And above all Fascism denies that class-war can be the preponderant force in thetransformation of society."
These both show how Italy and Germany didnt want class struggles and wanted them to have equal rights...
1. i think that nazism would appeal more to adolecence at the time because most kids werent allowed to get an education and in Nazism they'd be allowed to get one no matter if they were really poor or really rich...
2. i thinkn that it would be the hardest to not have any real opinion in the government because it controls everything and i also think that itd be hard to only do things that were the best for the state and not best for yourself even if it hurt you...
3.i think itd be the hardest to make everyone turn on the outsiders and jews... also to give up thier religion if it conflicted with the nazi ideals...
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment